MAKNA AGAMA DALAM STRUKTUR SOSIAL MASYARAKAT ADAT PAPUA

Authors

  • Natasya Virginia Leuwol Universitas Victory Sorong
  • Leidy Damima Universitas Victory Sorong
  • Zeth Momot Universitas Victory Sorong
  • Bentelina Rut Fiay Universitas Victory Sorong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v4i7.1885

Keywords:

Religion, Social Structure, Indigenous Community, Papua

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the meaning of religion within the social structure of Papuan indigenous communities. In this context, religion is not merely understood as a system of spiritual belief, but also as a social force that shapes values, norms, leadership, and social relations. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with indigenous leaders and religious figures, participatory observation of religious and customary activities, and document analysis. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis, and data validity was ensured through source and method triangulation. The findings indicate that religion plays a significant role in strengthening social solidarity, legitimizing customary leadership, and serving as a means of social conflict resolution. Furthermore, religion is integrated with local wisdom and contributes to the preservation of cultural sustainability within Papuan indigenous communities. This study affirms that the integration of religion and customary practices forms a distinctive, dynamic, and adaptive social structure in Papuan indigenous society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Berger, P. L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books.

(2) Durkheim, E. (2001). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(3) Émile Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

(4) Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

(5) Hefner, R. W. (2013). World building and the rationality of conversion. In R. W. Hefner (Ed.), Conversion to Christianity: Historical and Anthropological Perspectives on a Great Transformation (pp. 3–44). Berkeley: University of California Press.

(6) James P. Spradley, Participant Observation (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980).

(7) Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

(8) Kamma, F. C. (1972). Koreri: Messianic Movements in the Biak-Numfor Culture Area. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

(9) Mansoben, J. R. (1995). Sistem Politik Tradisional di Irian Jaya. Jakarta: LIPI.

(10) Max Weber, The Sociology of Religion (Boston: Beacon Press, 1963).

(11) Rutherford, D. (2012). Laughing at Leviathan: Sovereignty and Audience in West Papua. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

(12) Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

(13) Sumule, A. I. (2003). Mencari Jalan Tengah: Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

(14) Widjojo, M. S. (2013). Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, Improving the Present and Securing the Future. Jakarta: LIPI Press.

(15) Weber, M. (1963). The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press

(16) Woodward, M. R. (2011). Java, Indonesia and Islam. Dordrecht: Springer.

(17) Yoman, S. (2010). Gereja dan Orang Asli Papua. Jayapura: Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Teologi Fajar Timur.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-10

How to Cite

Natasya Virginia Leuwol, Leidy Damima, Zeth Momot, & Bentelina Rut Fiay. (2024). MAKNA AGAMA DALAM STRUKTUR SOSIAL MASYARAKAT ADAT PAPUA. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 4(7), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v4i7.1885

Most read articles by the same author(s)